WKB Quantization Condition Calculator (Quantum Bouncer)

Find the WKB-quantized energy levels of a particle bouncing under a uniform force field, the quantum bouncer problem.

⚡ WKB Quantization Condition Calculator (Quantum Bouncer)
m/s²
kg
Energy (En)
Characteristic length (l₀)
Turning-point height
Step-by-step working

⚡ What is the WKB Quantization (Quantum Bouncer) Calculator?

This WKB quantization calculator finds the quantized energy levels of a particle bouncing under a uniform force field off a hard floor, the "quantum bouncer" problem. Enter an acceleration (force per unit mass), a quantum number, and a particle mass, and it returns the WKB-quantized energy, the characteristic length scale of the bounce, and the classical turning-point height.

The general WKB quantization condition applies to almost any smoothly-varying potential, but only reduces to a clean, closed-form energy formula for a handful of specific shapes. This calculator is deliberately scoped to one of the cleanest and most famous of those cases: a particle under a constant force, reflecting off an impenetrable floor, held down by gravity or any other uniform force.

This is not just a textbook exercise. The GRANIT experiment measured exactly this system, ultracold neutrons bouncing on a horizontal mirror under Earth's gravity, and found a ground-state energy of about 1.4 picoelectronvolts, matching the WKB formula E_n = [3πħF(n−1/4)/(2√(2m))]^(2/3) closely. It remains one of the most direct demonstrations of quantum mechanics governed by gravity.

This calculator is useful for physics students exploring the WKB approximation beyond the tunneling case, and anyone curious about one of the few semiclassical problems confirmed by a real tabletop experiment.

📐 Formula

En  =  [3πħF(n−¼) ÷ (2√(2m))]2/3
En = energy of bounce state n (n = 1, 2, 3, ...)
F = mg, the uniform force acting on the particle
m = particle mass, g = acceleration (force per unit mass)
l₀ = (ħ²/(2m²g))1/3, the characteristic length scale of the bounce
Example: neutron, Earth's gravity, n = 1: E₁ ≈ 1.396 picoelectronvolts.

📖 How to Use This Calculator

Steps

1
Enter the acceleration g, 9.80665 m/s² for Earth's gravity.
2
Enter the quantum number n, 1 for the ground state.
3
Choose the particle, neutron, electron, proton, or a custom mass.
4
Read the quantized energy and the bounce's characteristic length scale.

💡 Example Calculations

Example 1 - Neutron ground state under Earth's gravity (GRANIT)

1
g = 9.80665 m/s², n = 1, neutron
2
F = mg = 1.6423×10-26 N
3
E₁ = 1.3960 × 10-12 eV (1.396 peV), matching the GRANIT measurement
E₁ = 1.3960 × 10-12 eV
Try this example →

Example 2 - Neutron, second bounce state (n=2)

1
g = 9.80665 m/s², n = 2, neutron
2
E₂ = 2.4558 × 10-12 eV (2.456 peV)
3
Only about 76% higher than E₁, illustrating the slow (n−¼)2/3 growth
E₂ = 2.4558 × 10-12 eV
Try this example →

Example 3 - Neutron, third bounce state (n=3)

1
g = 9.80665 m/s², n = 3, neutron
2
E₃ = 3.3194 × 10-12 eV (3.319 peV)
3
Characteristic length l₀ ≈ 5.8686 µm for this system, unusually large for a quantum length scale
E₃ = 3.3194 × 10-12 eV
Try this example →

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the WKB quantization condition?+
The WKB (Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin) quantization condition is a semiclassical recipe, ∮p dx = (n + phase)h, for finding approximate energy levels of a quantum system directly from its classical motion, without solving the Schrödinger equation exactly. It works well whenever the potential varies slowly compared to the particle's local de Broglie wavelength.
Why is this calculator scoped to a specific potential shape?+
The general WKB condition needs the classical turning points and the exact shape of the potential V(x), which for an arbitrary potential requires numerical integration with no simple algebraic formula. This calculator focuses on the one case with a clean, well-known closed-form result: a uniform force (a linear potential, V(x)=Fx) acting against a hard floor, often called the 'quantum bouncer'.
What is the quantum bouncer problem?+
The quantum bouncer describes a particle falling under a constant force (like gravity) that reflects off a hard floor at x=0, forming a series of bound, quantized 'bounce' states instead of falling continuously as a classical object would. Its WKB energy levels are E_n = [3πħF(n−1/4) / (2√(2m))]^(2/3), where F is the force and m is the particle's mass.
Has the quantum bouncer actually been observed experimentally?+
Yes. The GRANIT experiment (Nesvizhevsky et al., published in Nature in 2002) measured the quantized gravitational states of ultracold neutrons bouncing on a horizontal mirror, finding a ground-state energy of roughly 1.4 picoelectronvolts, in close agreement with this exact WKB formula. It remains one of the cleanest demonstrations of quantum mechanics acting under gravity.
Why does the formula use (n − 1/4) instead of just n?+
This is the Langer correction for a hard, rigid wall: the WKB phase accumulated at a hard wall is π/2, different from the π/4 phase accumulated at a smooth classical turning point (like the top of the bounce). Combining these two different boundary phases in the full quantization condition produces the (n − 1/4) factor rather than the (n − 1/2) or (n + 1/2) seen in other WKB problems.
What is the characteristic length scale l0?+
l0 = (ħ² / (2m²g))^(1/3) sets the natural height scale of the bounce, roughly how high the particle's wavefunction extends above the floor. For an ultracold neutron under Earth's gravity, l0 works out to about 5.9 micrometres, remarkably large for a quantum length scale, which is exactly why the effect is measurable in a tabletop experiment.
How do the energy levels compare to a classical bouncing ball?+
A classical ball under gravity can have any energy and bounces to any height. The quantum bouncer is restricted to a discrete ladder of allowed energies, E_n ∝ (n−1/4)^(2/3), each corresponding to a specific quantized bounce height. Unlike the evenly-spaced harmonic oscillator or the n²-scaled particle in a box, this ladder grows relatively slowly with n.
Does this formula apply to particles other than neutrons?+
Yes, in principle it applies to any particle under any uniform force, gravity, a uniform electric field, or any constant applied force, with the mass and force adjusted accordingly. In practice the gravitational quantum bouncer is most famous with neutrons because they are electrically neutral, so gravity (not electromagnetic forces) dominates their motion near a surface.
Is the WKB approximation exact for this problem?+
It is extremely accurate but not perfectly exact, the true eigenvalues come from Airy functions (the exact solution of the Schrödinger equation for a linear potential), and WKB reproduces them to within a fraction of a percent even for the ground state, improving further for higher n. This makes it one of the best-known examples of the WKB approximation's surprising accuracy even outside its formal 'large n' regime.
Why do the energy levels grow so slowly with n?+
Because E_n scales as (n−1/4)^(2/3), a power less than 1, each additional quantum number adds progressively less energy than the last, in contrast to the particle in a box (which scales as n², growing faster than linearly). This reflects the shape of the linear potential: climbing higher against a constant force takes proportionally less extra 'phase space' per level than climbing the steep walls of a box.

What is the WKB quantization condition?

The WKB (Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin) quantization condition is a semiclassical recipe, ∮p dx = (n + phase)h, for finding approximate energy levels of a quantum system directly from its classical motion, without solving the Schrödinger equation exactly. It works well whenever the potential varies slowly compared to the particle's local de Broglie wavelength.

Why is this calculator scoped to a specific potential shape?

The general WKB condition needs the classical turning points and the exact shape of the potential V(x), which for an arbitrary potential requires numerical integration with no simple algebraic formula. This calculator focuses on the one case with a clean, well-known closed-form result: a uniform force (a linear potential, V(x)=Fx) acting against a hard floor, often called the 'quantum bouncer'.

What is the quantum bouncer problem?

The quantum bouncer describes a particle falling under a constant force (like gravity) that reflects off a hard floor at x=0, forming a series of bound, quantized 'bounce' states instead of falling continuously as a classical object would. Its WKB energy levels are E_n = [3πħF(n−1/4) / (2√(2m))]^(2/3), where F is the force and m is the particle's mass.

Has the quantum bouncer actually been observed experimentally?

Yes. The GRANIT experiment (Nesvizhevsky et al., published in Nature in 2002) measured the quantized gravitational states of ultracold neutrons bouncing on a horizontal mirror, finding a ground-state energy of roughly 1.4 picoelectronvolts, in close agreement with this exact WKB formula. It remains one of the cleanest demonstrations of quantum mechanics acting under gravity.

Why does the formula use (n − 1/4) instead of just n?

This is the Langer correction for a hard, rigid wall: the WKB phase accumulated at a hard wall is π/2, different from the π/4 phase accumulated at a smooth classical turning point (like the top of the bounce). Combining these two different boundary phases in the full quantization condition produces the (n − 1/4) factor rather than the (n − 1/2) or (n + 1/2) seen in other WKB problems.

What is the characteristic length scale l0?

l0 = (ħ² / (2m²g))^(1/3) sets the natural height scale of the bounce, roughly how high the particle's wavefunction extends above the floor. For an ultracold neutron under Earth's gravity, l0 works out to about 5.9 micrometres, remarkably large for a quantum length scale, which is exactly why the effect is measurable in a tabletop experiment.

How do the energy levels compare to a classical bouncing ball?

A classical ball under gravity can have any energy and bounces to any height. The quantum bouncer is restricted to a discrete ladder of allowed energies, E_n ∝ (n−1/4)^(2/3), each corresponding to a specific quantized bounce height. Unlike the evenly-spaced harmonic oscillator or the n²-scaled particle in a box, this ladder grows relatively slowly with n.

Does this formula apply to particles other than neutrons?

Yes, in principle it applies to any particle under any uniform force, gravity, a uniform electric field, or any constant applied force, with the mass and force adjusted accordingly. In practice the gravitational quantum bouncer is most famous with neutrons because they are electrically neutral, so gravity (not electromagnetic forces) dominates their motion near a surface.

Is the WKB approximation exact for this problem?

It is extremely accurate but not perfectly exact, the true eigenvalues come from Airy functions (the exact solution of the Schrödinger equation for a linear potential), and WKB reproduces them to within a fraction of a percent even for the ground state, improving further for higher n. This makes it one of the best-known examples of the WKB approximation's surprising accuracy even outside its formal 'large n' regime.

Why do the energy levels grow so slowly with n?

Because E_n scales as (n−1/4)^(2/3), a power less than 1, each additional quantum number adds progressively less energy than the last, in contrast to the particle in a box (which scales as n², growing faster than linearly). This reflects the shape of the linear potential: climbing higher against a constant force takes proportionally less extra 'phase space' per level than climbing the steep walls of a box.