Spitzer Resistivity and Conductivity Calculator
Find a plasma's Spitzer resistivity and conductivity, showing why a hot fusion plasma conducts electricity better than copper.
🔌 What is the Spitzer Resistivity and Conductivity Calculator?
This Spitzer resistivity calculator finds a fully ionized plasma's electrical resistivity and conductivity from its density, temperature, and ion charge state. Enter these three values, and it returns the resistivity in ohm-metres, the conductivity in siemens per metre, and the underlying Coulomb logarithm.
Unlike a metal, where resistivity comes from electrons scattering off a fixed crystal lattice, plasma resistivity comes purely from electron-ion Coulomb collisions, and Lyman Spitzer derived the classic closed-form result η = 1.03×10⁻⁴ Z lnΛ / Te^(3/2) ohm-metres for this process.
The striking result is that hot plasmas conduct electricity extremely well, far better than copper, because faster electrons are deflected less by each collision they experience. This is why tokamak ohmic heating (driving current through the resistive plasma) becomes ineffective above a few keV and auxiliary heating methods must take over.
This calculator is useful for plasma physics and fusion engineering students studying current drive, ohmic heating, and plasma transport, and anyone curious how a plasma's electrical properties compare to ordinary conductors.
📐 Formula
📖 How to Use This Calculator
Steps
💡 Example Calculations
Example 1 - Tokamak fusion plasma core
Example 2 - Solar corona
Example 3 - Helium-like plasma (Z=2)
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
🔗 Related Calculators
What is Spitzer resistivity?
Spitzer resistivity is the electrical resistivity of a fully ionized plasma, derived by Lyman Spitzer from the physics of electron-ion Coulomb collisions. Unlike a metal, where resistivity comes from electrons scattering off a fixed lattice, plasma resistivity comes from electrons scattering off moving, thermally-agitated ions.
What is the formula for Spitzer resistivity?
η = 1.03×10⁻⁴ × Z × lnΛ / Te[eV]^(3/2) ohm-metres, a standard closed-form result from the NRL Plasma Formulary, where Z is the ion charge state, lnΛ is the Coulomb logarithm, and Te is the electron temperature in electronvolts.
Why does resistivity decrease so strongly with temperature?
Faster electrons (higher temperature) spend less time near each ion as they fly past, so each Coulomb collision deflects them less, resistivity scales as Te^(-3/2). This is the opposite of a metal, where resistivity typically increases with temperature due to more lattice vibrations.
How does a hot fusion plasma compare to copper?
Copper's resistivity at room temperature is about 1.7×10⁻⁸ ohm-metres. A 10 keV tokamak plasma has a Spitzer resistivity around 1.8×10⁻⁹ ohm-metres, roughly ten times lower (a better conductor) than copper, and this gap widens further at higher temperatures.
Why does resistivity depend on the ion charge state Z?
Higher-charge ions (like fully-stripped carbon or oxygen instead of hydrogen) scatter electrons more strongly per collision because the Coulomb force scales with the ion's charge, so resistivity increases linearly with Z. This is one reason fusion reactors try to minimize high-Z impurity contamination, it directly raises plasma resistivity and radiated power.
What is the difference between resistivity and conductivity here?
Conductivity σ is simply the reciprocal of resistivity, σ = 1/η, and both describe the same underlying physics, resistivity emphasizes how much a plasma resists current flow, while conductivity emphasizes how easily current flows through it.
Why does this calculator compute the Coulomb logarithm internally?
The Coulomb logarithm is a required ingredient of the Spitzer formula, and since it only depends on the same density and temperature already entered here, this calculator computes it automatically using the same standard NRL formula as the dedicated <a href="/science/plasma-physics/coulomb-logarithm-calculator/">Coulomb Logarithm Calculator</a>, so no separate lookup is needed.
Why is ohmic heating limited in tokamaks?
Ohmic heating drives a current through the resistive plasma to heat it directly, but since resistivity falls as Te^(-3/2), the heating power (which scales as current squared times resistivity) drops off rapidly as the plasma gets hotter. Beyond a few keV, ohmic heating alone becomes too weak, so tokamaks switch to auxiliary heating methods like neutral beam injection or radiofrequency waves.
Is Spitzer resistivity the same in every direction relative to the magnetic field?
No, this calculator computes the parallel (along the magnetic field) resistivity, which is the lowest of the two. Perpendicular resistivity (across field lines) is generally higher because gyrating electrons cannot move freely across the field the way they can along it, though the parallel value is the one most often quoted as 'the' Spitzer resistivity.
How accurate is the Spitzer formula for real fusion plasmas?
The classical Spitzer formula assumes a fully ionized, weakly-coupled, collisional plasma and works well for describing the bulk resistive behavior of most laboratory and fusion plasmas, though real tokamaks show additional 'anomalous' resistivity from turbulence beyond this simple collisional picture, particularly during current disruptions or in the plasma edge.