Higgs Boson Decay Width Estimator
Estimate the tree-level Higgs partial decay width to a fermion-antifermion pair, and see how it compares against the measured Standard Model value.
🎯 What is the Higgs Boson Decay Width Estimator?
This Higgs boson decay width estimator computes the tree-level (leading order) Standard Model partial decay width of the Higgs boson to a fermion-antifermion pair, using the formula Gamma = (Nc GF mf squared mH) / (4 root2 pi) times (1 minus 4mf squared/mH squared) to the 1.5 power. It reports the result in both MeV and keV, and compares it directly against the measured Standard Model reference value for the four built-in fermion presets.
Particle physics students use this calculator to explore how the Higgs coupling strength scales with fermion mass, the central experimental signature that confirmed the Higgs mechanism actually gives mass to fermions (Yukawa coupling), not just to the W and Z bosons. It is also a useful worked example for the difference between a tree-level estimate and a full radiatively-corrected calculation, a distinction that comes up constantly in quantum field theory coursework.
A common point of confusion is treating this tree-level number as if it should exactly match the measured branching ratios reported by ATLAS and CMS. It will not, for quark channels. Bottom and charm quarks receive sizable QCD radiative corrections that are completely omitted here, so their tree-level widths sit systematically 15 to 20% below the measured value. Leptons like tau and muon carry no color charge and receive no such correction, so their tree-level widths match the measured value within a few percent, this quark-versus-lepton contrast is the most physically interesting thing this calculator shows.
This calculator also uses MS-bar running quark masses evaluated at the Higgs mass scale, not the familiar pole masses used in most everyday particle physics calculations (including the Bethe-Bloch Energy Loss Calculator elsewhere on this site). Running masses are noticeably smaller for quarks, which is intentional and physically correct for this specific calculation, not a typo.
📐 Formula
📖 How to Use This Calculator
Steps
💡 Example Calculations
Example 1 - Bottom quark pair (the dominant Higgs decay channel)
Example 2 - Tau lepton pair (no QCD correction, close match)
Example 3 - Charm quark pair (same undershoot pattern as bottom)
Example 4 - Muon pair (lightest built-in fermion, close match)
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
🔗 Related Calculators
What does a partial decay width mean physically?
A partial decay width Gamma for a specific final state is the contribution that channel makes to the particle's total decay rate, measured in energy units (MeV here). Larger partial width means the Higgs decays to that fermion pair more often relative to other channels, the sum of all partial widths gives the total width, about 4.07 MeV for the Higgs boson.
Why does the formula scale as the fermion mass squared?
The Higgs boson couples to fermions with a strength directly proportional to their mass, a direct consequence of the Higgs mechanism giving fermions their mass through this same coupling. Squaring that coupling in the decay rate formula gives the m_f squared scaling, which is also why the Higgs decays overwhelmingly to the heaviest kinematically accessible fermion, bottom quarks, rather than lighter ones.
Why is the tree-level bottom quark result lower than the measured value?
This calculator computes only the leading order (tree-level) width, about 1.91 MeV for bb, while the measured Standard Model value is about 2.35 MeV. The gap comes from higher-order QCD radiative corrections, which are significant for colored quarks like bottom and charm but are completely absent for leptons. This tree-level number should not be read as matching the measured value directly.
Why do the tau and muon results match the measured value so closely?
Leptons carry no color charge, so they receive no QCD radiative corrections at all, the electroweak corrections that do apply are much smaller. That is why the tree-level formula used here gives about 0.259 MeV for tau (measured about 0.257 MeV) and about 0.918 keV for muon (measured about 0.887 keV), both within a few percent, while the quark channels undershoot by 15 to 20%.
What is the difference between a running mass and a pole mass?
A pole mass is the mass you would measure for a free, isolated particle, the everyday value used in most kinematics calculations. A running (MS-bar) mass instead depends on the energy scale at which it is evaluated, due to quantum corrections, and for quarks it is noticeably smaller than the pole mass at high energy scales. This calculator uses running masses evaluated at the Higgs mass scale (for example 2.79 GeV for the bottom quark, versus a pole mass closer to 4.8 GeV), which is why these values look smaller than the quark masses used elsewhere on this site.
Why is the Higgs mass fixed at 125.25 GeV instead of a user input?
125.25 GeV is the current measured Standard Model Higgs boson mass, a well established experimental result from ATLAS and CMS. Letting it vary would not represent a real physical scenario, so this calculator treats it as a constant and only lets the fermion mass, color factor, and fermion choice vary.
Which fermion presets does this calculator include?
Bottom quark (mf=2.79 GeV, Nc=3), charm quark (mf=0.62 GeV, Nc=3), tau lepton (mf=1.77686 GeV, Nc=1), and muon (mf=0.1056584 GeV, Nc=1) are built in using MS-bar running masses at the Higgs scale, or you can enter a custom mass and color factor for any hypothetical fermion.
What does the color factor Nc represent?
Nc counts the number of color states a fermion can carry. Quarks come in 3 colors (Nc=3), so each quark flavor contributes 3 times as much to the decay rate as a single lepton generation would at the same mass, since the Higgs can produce the fermion pair in any of the 3 color combinations. Leptons carry no color charge, so Nc=1 for tau and muon.
Why can't the Higgs decay to a top quark pair?
The top quark mass (about 173 GeV) is more than twice the Higgs mass (125.25 GeV), so there is not enough energy to create a top-antitop pair, this is why the (1 - 4mf squared/mH squared) term in the formula would become negative and the decay is kinematically forbidden. This calculator returns an error if you enter a custom mass above about 62.6 GeV for exactly this reason.
How accurate is this tree-level estimate overall?
For leptons (tau, muon) it is accurate to within a few percent of the measured Standard Model value. For quarks (bottom, charm) it systematically undershoots by roughly 15 to 20%, since QCD radiative corrections, which this simplified calculator omits, meaningfully increase the true partial width for colored particles.
What is the total Higgs decay width and how does bb fit in?
The Standard Model total Higgs decay width is about 4.07 MeV, with the bb channel alone making up roughly 58% of it (about 2.35 MeV), the single largest decay channel, precisely because the bottom quark is the heaviest fermion the Higgs can kinematically decay to in a fermion pair.