Capacitance of Various Geometries Calculator
Find the capacitance of a parallel-plate, spherical, or coaxial cylindrical capacitor from its geometry and dielectric.
🔌 What is the Capacitance of Various Geometries Calculator?
The Capacitance of Various Geometries Calculator computes capacitance for the three classic idealized capacitor geometries taught in electromagnetics, parallel plates, concentric spheres, and coaxial cylinders, from each geometry's characteristic dimensions and dielectric permittivity.
Students and engineers use these formulas to build intuition for how capacitance depends on geometry, size coaxial cable and transmission line capacitance per unit length, model isolated charged conductors, and verify hand calculations before running full electromagnetic field simulation.
A common point of confusion is expecting all three geometries to scale the same way with their characteristic dimension. Parallel-plate capacitance scales inversely with separation, spherical capacitance approaches a finite isolated-sphere limit as the outer radius grows, and cylindrical capacitance scales with the logarithm of the radius ratio, three genuinely different mathematical relationships.
This calculator computes the capacitance for whichever geometry you select and plots how it varies with the key dimension, so you can see each geometry's distinct characteristic curve.
📐 Formula
📖 How to Use This Calculator
Steps
💡 Example Calculations
Example 1 — Parallel-Plate Capacitor
Parallel Plate mode: A=10cm², d=1mm, εr=1
Example 2 — Spherical Capacitor
Spherical mode: r1=10mm, r2=20mm, εr=1
Example 3 — Coaxial Cylindrical Capacitor
Cylindrical mode: L=100mm, r1=1mm, r2=5mm, εr=1
Example 4 — Cylindrical Capacitor with Dielectric
Cylindrical mode: L=50mm, r1=2mm, r2=7mm, εr=2.3
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
🔗 Related Calculators
What is the formula for parallel-plate capacitance?
C = epsilon_0 x epsilon_r x A / d, where A is the plate area, d is the separation, epsilon_0 is the permittivity of free space, and epsilon_r is the dielectric's relative permittivity. This is the simplest and most commonly used capacitance formula in introductory electronics.
What is the formula for spherical (concentric-sphere) capacitance?
C = 4 x pi x epsilon_0 x epsilon_r x (r1 x r2) / (r2 - r1), for two concentric conducting spheres of inner radius r1 and outer radius r2 with dielectric filling the gap between them. This models an idealized spherical capacitor geometry.
What is the formula for cylindrical (coaxial) capacitance?
C = 2 x pi x epsilon_0 x epsilon_r x L / ln(r2/r1), for two concentric cylindrical conductors of length L, inner radius r1, and outer radius r2. This is the same formula used to compute the capacitance per unit length of coaxial cable.
Why does capacitance depend on the logarithm of the radius ratio in the cylindrical case?
The electric field between concentric cylinders falls off as 1/r moving outward, and integrating 1/r to find the voltage between the two radii produces a natural logarithm term, ln(r2/r1), which is why cylindrical (and coaxial) capacitance scales with the log of the radius ratio rather than the ratio itself.
What happens to spherical capacitance as the outer sphere becomes very large?
As r2 approaches infinity with r1 fixed, the spherical capacitance formula approaches C = 4 x pi x epsilon_0 x epsilon_r x r1, the capacitance of a single isolated sphere relative to a conductor infinitely far away. This is a classic limiting case used to introduce the concept of self-capacitance.
Which geometry is most relevant to real-world capacitors?
Parallel-plate geometry describes most ceramic, film, and multilayer capacitors, while cylindrical (coaxial) geometry describes coaxial cables and some wound capacitor constructions. Spherical geometry is mostly a teaching tool and a model for isolated charged conductors, true spherical capacitors are uncommon in practice.
How does the dielectric affect capacitance in each geometry?
In all three geometries, capacitance scales linearly with the relative permittivity epsilon_r of the material filling the gap between conductors, a higher-permittivity dielectric always increases capacitance proportionally, regardless of which geometry it fills.
Why is the parallel-plate formula only an approximation?
The parallel-plate formula assumes a perfectly uniform field between infinite plates, ignoring the fringing (edge) field that exists at the boundary of any real, finite-sized plate. It becomes progressively less accurate as the plate separation grows relative to the plate dimensions.
Can I use this for coaxial cable capacitance per unit length?
Yes, set L to 1 meter (or any unit length) in cylindrical mode and the result gives capacitance per that length, which is exactly how coaxial cable capacitance is normally specified (for example, in picofarads per meter or per foot).
What units does this calculator use?
Plate area is in square centimeters, lengths and separations in millimeters, and relative permittivity is dimensionless. All capacitance results are reported in picofarads.